Math Male , Me Female , Therefore Math Me

By Brian A. Nosek, Mahzarin R. Banaji, A. Greenwald. 2002

Subfields: AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

Citations in the corpus

StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models (2020, neutral): “We collect gender terms from Nosek et al. (2002).”
On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders (2019, background): “because they instantiate a disciplinary dichotomy between math/science and arts/language (Nosek et al., 2002).”
Unpacking the Gender System (2004, background): “Although inequality persists, recent decades have brought significant improvements in women’s position in the public sphere, as reflected in indices such as the wage gap between men and women and women’s representation in high-status occupations (Padovic and Reskin 2002).”
Black Americans' Implicit Racial Associations And Their Implications for Intergroup Judgment (2003, background): “Indeed, mounting evidence suggests that many—though not all—black individuals do hold outgroup–favoring associations at the implicit level (Livingston, 2002; Nosek et al., 2002; Spicer, 1999).”
The effect of priming gender roles on women's implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations (2010, unknown): “Past research suggests that women who possess implicit gender stereotypes are less likely to believe they can succeed as a leader (Dasgupta & Asgari, 2004) and they report low interest in graduate work in mathematics (Keifer & Sekaquaptewa, 2007a; for related findings, see Davies, Spencer, Quinn, & ”
How Development and Personality Influence Scientific Thought, Interest, and Achievement (2006, background): “…in science or math, whether it comes in the form of explicit attitudes (Eccles, 1987; Hyde, Fennema, Ryan, Frost, & Hopp, 1990), implicit attitudes (Nosek et al., 2002), performance on aptitude tests (Benbow & Stanley, 1983; Benbow & Lubinski, 1993; Benbow, Lubinski, Shea, & EftekhariSanjani,…”
Implicit Social Cognitions Predict Sex Differences in Math Engagement and Achievement (2011, background): “.0 4 ar e si g n if ic an t at a = .0 5 . have opposite relations with implicit math favorability for men and women (Greenwald et al., 2002; Nosek et al., 2002).”
Gender, Competitiveness and Career Choices (2012, unknown): “5For the potential importance of stereotypes on preferences of females over mathematics see Nosek et al. (2002), Kiefer and Sekaquaptewa (2007) and Ceci et al. (2009).”
A World of Difference: International Trends in Women's Economic Status (2011, background): “F or p er so na l u se o nl y. & West 2002, Nosek et al. 2002, Faulkner 2007, Ridgeway 2009).”
Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project (2022, background): “13 Implicit math attitudes relations with self-reported attitudes (Nosek et al., 2002).”