The effect of priming gender roles on women's implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations

By Laurie A. Rudman, J. Phelan. 2010

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d06905627e57ce68e96b49a906565afb437ac78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Esther Duflo
2. Rohini Pande
3. S. Murphy
4. P. Topalova
5. Crystal L. Hoyt
6. Lori Beaman
7. Michelle K. Ryan
8. Thekla Morgenroth

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Murphy
2. Rohini Pande
3. Crystal L. Hoyt
4. Lori Beaman
5. Michelle K. Ryan
6. Thekla Morgenroth
7. Kim Peters
8. Esther Duflo

Citations in the corpus

• Implicit Attitudes and Beliefs Adapt to Situations: A Decade of Research on the Malleability of Implicit Prejudice, Stereotypes, and the Self-Concept (2013, background): “However, when the same women were framed as different from the self, they either had no effect on participants’ implicit self-beliefs or sometimes backfired—deflating participants’ implicit self-beliefs about leadership (see also Parks-Stamm, Heilman, & Hearns, 2008; Rudman & Phelan, 2010).”
• The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals (2015, background): “For example, Rudman and Phelan (2010) demonstrated that when primed with traditional gender roles, women’s implicit self-stereotyping (i.e., the degree to which they saw themselves as similar to a stereotypical woman) explained the effect between said priming and decreased interest in…”
• Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model (2011, background): “…women were framed as unique or very different from participants, they did not improve participants’ implicit selfbeliefs, and in fact it sometimes backfired—deflating participants’ implicit self-beliefs about leadership (see also Parks-Stamm, Heilman, & Hearns, 2008; Rudman & Phelan, 2010).”
• Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016, background): “Similarly, learning about counter-stereotypical role models (e.g., a female surgeon or a female business executive) reduced women's leadership self-concept and diminished their interest in traditionally masculine occupations relative to those not exposed to these role models (Rudman & Phelan, 2010).”
• Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India (2012, background): “Role incongruity is often emphasized as the source of the gap in beliefs (9, 10), raising the possibility that role models can challenge prevalent stereotypes and help reduce this gap.”