Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential

By Robert J. Sternberg, Elena L. Grigorenko. 2001

484 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a63128c30b916f7b6542079a4f45a53d30c4a9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. K. Davin
2. Seth Chaiklin
3. Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
4. N. Veresov
5. Aaro Toomela
6. Marilyn Fleer
7. J. Smit

Citations in the corpus

• Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom (2013, methodology): “A teacher might employ a variety of the forms of assistance presented by Tharp and Gallimore (1991) based on students’ needs.”
• The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. (2003, background): “⎯ some researchers argue that the zone of proximal development is created in interaction between child and adult (e.g., Davydov, 1998, p. 29; Mercer and Fisher, 1992, p. 342; Sternberg & Grigorenko, 2002, pp. 37-38).”
• Dynamic assessment in the language classroom (2005, unknown): “To appreciate this difference, we draw on Valsiner (2001), who analyses three ways of construing the future in developmental psychology.”