Authentic assessment, student and teacher perceptions: the practical value of the five‐dimensional framework
By Judith T. M. Gulikers, Theo J. Bastiaens, Paul A. Kirschner. 2006
121 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Media Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5976e0fdc04bb29889c962b777594c1a5c200f41
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Riza Casidy
- L. James
- Liesbeth Kester
- Theo J. Bastiaens
- Paul A. Kirschner
- Judith T. M. Gulikers
- John Sweller
- Fred Paas
In Media Technology
- Riza Casidy
- L. James
- Liesbeth Kester
- Paul A. Kirschner
- Theo J. Bastiaens
- Judith T. M. Gulikers
- Shaw-Chiang Wong
Citations in the corpus
- Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: student and teacher perceptions of assessment authenticity (2008, methodology): “Subjective authenticity and the role of perceptions The educational goal of authentic assessments is to stimulate deep learning activities and the development of more professionally relevant skills or competences (Boud, 1995; Gulikers et al., 2006a; Tillema et al., 2000).”
- Authentic assessment in business education: its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behaviour (2018, methodology): “In their study, Gulikers, Bastiaens, and Kirschner (2006) found that while the surveyed educators perceived all five dimensions as important facets in determining an assessment’s authenticity, the surveyed students did not perceive social context as an important facet.”