Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change

By Richard R. Nelson. Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth, 2005

1,223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/585db55d9afbb70c72e7661671db65e104dcade0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Testing a Life-Cycle Theory of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships: Movement Across Stages and Performance (2007, background): “and choices strongly influence its present performance and choices (Nelson 1995).”
Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? (2006, neutral): “…1997), (2) strategy and its concomitant structural analysis of industries and competitors (Porter, 1995), (3) evolutionary economic thinking (Nelson, 1995) and (4) a new vision for industry, academia and government interactions as encompassed by the ‘Triple Helix’ model (Etzkowitz and…”
Exploring evolutionary economic geographies (2007, background): “…economics targeted issues that neoclassical theory then seemed least capable of explaining in depth, namely economic growth (Nelson andWinter, 1982; Nelson, 1995; Verspagen, 2001), technological change (Arthur, 1983, 1989; Dosi, 1982; Dosi et al., 1988; David, 1985; Pavitt, 2005), industrial…”
Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes* (2007, neutral): “See Faigen et al. (1995: Proposition 2.5.1) 10 Nelson identify institutions with prominent organizations such as ‘industry associations, technical societies, universities, courts, government agencies, legislatures, etc.’ (Nelson, 1995: 57).”
Post‐Acquisition Restructuring as Evolutionary Process* (2003, background): “Routines connote “behavior that is conducted without much explicit thinking about it, as habit or customs … [or] as the behaviors deemed appropriate and effective in the settings where they are invoked” (Nelson, 1995:68).”
Policy learning in Europe: the open method of co-ordination and laboratory federalism (2007, methodology): “This is reflected in the use of evolutionary approaches in the tradition of Schumpeter and Hayek and in the use of variation selection models in innovation economics (Hayek 1978; Nelson 1995; Kerber 2005).”
Self-Organisation: Paradigms and Applications (2003, neutral): “Recent work [20] showed that real complex networks do not behave like random graphs.”
Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: evidence from six industries (2011, background): “…including imitation (that endengers both continuity and a collective element to the process of economic development), and selection (that reduces variety in the economic system and discourages the inefficient or ineffective utilization of resources) (Nelson,1995; Dosi,1997; Metcalfe,1998).”
Becoming an Adult in Uncertain Times: A 14-Country Comparison of the Losers of Globalization (2006, background): “These institutions have a certain inertial tendency to persist (NELSON, 1995; ESPING-ANDERSEN, 1993) and act as a sort of intervening variable between global macro forces and the responses at the micro level”
A system failure framework for innovation policy design (2005, background): “This process of novelty and variety creation is the result of constant interaction among heterogeneous actors in a population (Smith, 1999) and is necessary to maintain the diversity that makes selection possible (Nelson, 1995; McKelvey, 1997).”
Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors (2005, background): “Thus networks allow the access to, and the integration of, complementarities in knowledge, capabilities and specialisation (see Teubal, et al., 1991; Lundvall, 1993; Nelson, 1995; Edquist, 1997).”
The microfoundations of macroeconomics: an evolutionary perspective (2003, background): “Finally, evolution is a real phenomenon taking place at a horizontal organisational structure of the economy, involving science, technology, businesses, markets, the legal system, consumer preferences, and institutions and culture at a wider level ( Nelson, 1995 ).”