Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study

By Elena Reutskaja, Rosemarie Nagel, Colin F. Camerer, Antonio Rangel. 2011

557 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/582ba01e5a288305a59f1b72baee94ec6ad18985

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. (2013, background): “, 2012), position (Atalay et al., 2012; Chandon et al., 2009; Navalpakkam et al., 2012; Reutskaja et al., 2011), and surface size (Chandon et al.”
Imperfect Choice or Imperfect Attention? Understanding Strategic Thinking in Private Information Games (2014, background): “Recent economic studies propose and test " directed cognition " (Gabaix et al., 2006), search under time pressure (Reutskaja et al., 2011), and look for within-attribute vs. within-choice comparisons (Arieli et al., 2011).”
The mere urgency effect. (2018, background): “Our attention-based account also provides a plausible explanation for some of the prior findings uncovered by the eye-tracking methodology, such as the phenomenon that the search process under time pressure is random with respect to value, and the observation that options with higher value are not m”
Speed, Accuracy, and the Optimal Timing of Choices (2018, background): “…experiments, where subjects are choosing from a set of consumption goods presented to them: Roe, Busemeyer and Townsend (2001), Clithero and Rangel (2013); Krajbich, Armel and Rangel (2010); Krajbich and Rangel (2011); Krajbich et al. (2012); Milosavljevic et al. (2010); Reutskaja et al. (2011).”
Eye Tracking Reveals Processes that Enable Conjoint Choices to Become Increasingly Efficient with Practice (2016, background): “We also do not develop a search model based on attentional information (Reutskaja et al. 2011) or a joint model of information processing and choice as other authors have done (Gabaix et al.”
Attention Discrimination: Theory and Field Experiments with Monitoring Information Acquisition (2016, methodology): “These techniques involve eye-tracking (Knoepfle, Wang and Camerer 2009, Arieli, Ben-Ami and Rubinstein 2011, Reutskaja, Nagel, Camerer and Rangel 2011) or its computer-based analog mouse-tracking, pioneered by Camerer, Johnson, Rymon and Sen (1993) and later used most prominently by Costa-Gomes, Cra”
Understanding consumers' in-store visual perception: The influence of package design features on visual attention (2013, background): “Even though consumers combine several visual features for optimizing the search process, it has only a random effect (Reutskaja et al., 2011) and they optimize better by making up their own stopping rules.”
Visual Attention and Attribute Attendance in Multi-Attribute Choice Experiments (2015, methodology): “For example, eye-tracking has been used to experimentally examine visual search and how this relates to decision making (e.g., Knoepfle et al., 2009 and Reutskaja et al., 2011), and in sender-receiver games it has been found that pupil dilation is correlated with deception (Wang et al., 2010).”