Imperfect Choice or Imperfect Attention? Understanding Strategic Thinking in Private Information Games

By Isabelle Brocas, Juan D. Carrillo, Stephanie W. Wang, Colin F. Camerer. 2014

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a575c064c7fd0f7a394f5b2b74fae93f747c8f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Nagore Iriberri
2. Vincent P. Crawford
3. Miguel A. Costa-Gomes
4. Tore Ellingsen
5. Joseph Tao-yi Wang
6. Hongbin Cai
7. Kevin Leyton-Brown
8. James R. Wright

In Safety Research

1. Nagore Iriberri
2. Vincent P. Crawford
3. Miguel A. Costa-Gomes
4. Tore Ellingsen
5. Kevin Leyton-Brown
6. James R. Wright
7. Colin F. Camerer
8. Charles D. Sprenger

Citations in the corpus

• Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications (2013, methodology): “The model is used to analyze the results of experiments on zero-sum betting (Camerer, Ho, and Chong 2004; Brocas et al. 2010) and auctions with private information (Crawford and Iriberri 2007b).”