Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future

2,424 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modelling Bounded Rationality in Organizations: Progress and Prospects† (2015, background): “Under the term “ambidexterity” (O’Reilly and Tushman, 2013) a significant empirical”
Do Humble CEOs Matter? An Examination of CEO Humility and Firm Outcomes (2018, background): “We tested and found support for this model in a high-tech industry in which an ambidextrous strategic orientation may be essential for survival and success (O’Reilly & Tushman, 2013).”
Inclusive Business at the Base of the Pyramid: The Role of Embeddedness for Enabling Social Innovations (2018, neutral): “…ambidexterity; (b) partnerships and co-creation and (c) native capabilities and bricolage. a) Organizational ambidexterity is the ability to combine business processes underpinned by different end goals, logics and time horizons (Raisch and Birkinshaw, 2008; O'Reilly and Tushman, 2013).”
Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation (2018, background): “…1985) so as to avoid the risk of being mediocre at both (March 1991); although subsequently, the notion of balancing these two types of activities to ensure superior performance has gained greater recognition (Gibson and Birkinshaw, 2004; O'Reilly and Tushman, 2013; Raisch and Birkinshaw, 2008).”