Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the

646 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Development and Validation of the Mathematical Resilience Scale (2016, methodology): “The other sample was used to complete a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the fit of the data to the theoretical structure using Amos 18.0.0 (Arbuckle, 2009; Thompson, 2010).”
Why do small and medium enterprises use social media marketing and what is the impact: Empirical insights from India (2020, background): “In this context, researchers opine that inadequate sample size would result in decreased generalizability (Kline, 2013).”
Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self‐Efficacy: A Validation Study (2016, methodology): “Items were next subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine their factor structure (Field, 2013; Thompson, 2004).”
Motivational Profiles of Adult Learners (2017, background): “the cutoff criteria based on comparative fit index greater than .90 and root mean square error of approximation less than .10 (Kline, 2013).”
The Simple View of Reading Across Development: Prediction of Grade 3 Reading Comprehension From Prekindergarten Skills (2018, methodology): “Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) was used to compare competing models: smaller AICs indicate better fit (Kline, 2013) and the chi-square difference test was also used to compare fit of nested models.”