An ‘infusion’ approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate

By Martin Davies. 2006

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56ee73440f5682803bddd13732b4dc66620fbbd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. C. Golding
2. Martin Davies
3. G. Matkin
4. J. Webster
5. Richard Thomas Watson

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. C. Golding
2. Martin Davies

Citations in the corpus

• Educating for critical thinking: thought‐encouraging questions in a community of inquiry (2011, background): “This has been a long‐standing controversy that continues in this journal with Moore ( 2004 ) championing the specifist position, versus Davies ( 2006 ) who takes the generalist position.”
• Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered (2013, background): “By contrast, Moore seems to think it is unique; or, to use an old fashioned term – a sui generis sense of critical thinking (CT2).”
• Deficient Critical Thinking Skills among College Graduates: Implications for leadership (2012, background): “Davies (2006) finds fault in the forced dichotomy of this framework and suggests an ‘infusion’ approach that utilizes concepts from both paradigms.”