Research Methodology and Critical Mathematics Education

By O. Skovsmose, M. Borba. 2004

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Students’ Critical Awareness of Voice and Agency in Mathematics Classroom Discourse (2007, background): “This research was an investigation of possibility in the sense described by Skovsmose and Borba (2004) in their methodology for critical mathematics education: Doing critical research means not only to consider what is taking place but also to consider what could have taken place and what could be…”
Probability and Statistical Inference: How Can Teachers Enable Learners to Make the Connection? (2005, methodology): “Based on the ideas of Gravemeijer (1998) and Skovsmose and Borba (2000) , a developmental research method was used (Pfannkuch & Horring, 2004).”
Democratic Access to Powerful Mathematical Ideas (2008, background): “Since this whole discussion is so broad and it is not our intention to tackle it here, we merely mention the work of Skovsmose & Borba (2000) and Vithal (2000a, 2000b) who have tried to approach this question. including the mathematics classroom.”