Not so Above Average After All: When People Believe They are Worse than Average and its Implications for Theories of Bias in Social Comparison
By Don A Moore. 2007
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5657dc1cd9a590b1b3824f6dec77e4c3b76e7449
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Constantine Sedikides
- Francesca Gino
- Adam J. L. Harris
- Jen Shang
- Rachel T. A. Croson
- Emily Haisley
- Paul S. Goodman
- Ulrike Hahn
In Social Psychology
- Constantine Sedikides
- A. Gregg
- Francesca Gino
- Claire E. Ashton-James
- Adam J. L. Harris
- Jen Shang
- Rachel T. A. Croson
- Emily Haisley
In Sociology and Political Science
- Constantine Sedikides
- A. Gregg
- Francesca Gino
- Claire E. Ashton-James
- Adam J. L. Harris
- Jen Shang
- Rachel T. A. Croson
- Emily Haisley
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought (2008, background): “illusions—might simply be due to controllable events and traits being more commonplace (Moore, 2007).”
- The trouble with overconfidence. (2008, unknown): “However, some research suggests that discrepancies between direct and indire ct elicitation methods are an artifact of question format, and that parallel quest ion formats can eliminate the discrepancy (Burson & Klayman, 2005; Moore, 2007).”
- The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment (2009, background): “This rarely happens ( 67 out of 1104 , about 6% of the cases ) , and in this study , following previous research , we truncate the WOA value to 1 ( Harvey & Fischer , 1997 ; Gino & Moore , 2007 ) .”
- When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence (2013, unknown): “For example, many people overestimate the superiority of their work performance (Cross, 1977; Haun, Zeringue, Leach, & Foley, 2000; Zenger, 1992), social skills (College Board, 1976–1977; Lewinsohn, Mischel, Chaplin, & Barton, 1980; Swann & Gill, 1997), and physical talents (Dunning, Meyerowitz, & H”
- What Does It Mean to be Biased: Motivated Reasoning and Rationality (2014, background): “(Kruger, 1999; Moore, 2007), and the false consensus effect (whereby people overestimate the extent to which others share their opinions, Ross, Greene, & House, 1977) is mirrored by the false uniqueness effect (Frable, 1993; Mullen, Dovidio, Johnson, & Copper, 1992; Suls, Wan, & Sanders, 1988).”
- Social comparison processes in organizations (2007, background): “Indeed, modern scientiWc wisdom is more highly nuanced (Moore, 2007).”
- Social comparison processes in an organizational context: New directions (2007, background): “Third, there are many well-rehearsed topics in the social comparison literature, such as the selection of upward or downward comparisons (Buunk & Gibbons, 2007) or ‘‘Betterthan-Average Effects’’ (e.g., Moore, 2007).”