The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment

By Francesca Gino, Jen Shang, Rachel T. A. Croson. 2009

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d872445e8cf25e0450d1045a476cdcc624cb083

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Richard P. Larrick
2. L. Tost
3. Francesca Gino
4. J. Logg

In Social Psychology

1. L. Tost
2. Richard P. Larrick
3. Francesca Gino
4. Henk W. Volberda

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Tost
2. Richard P. Larrick
3. Francesca Gino
4. Henk W. Volberda
5. Jatinder S. Sidhu
6. M. Heyden
7. Junha Kim
8. Y. Kim

Citations in the corpus

• Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don’t listen (2012, methodology): “These were treated as WOA=1 (or -1 for negative values) in computing the average WOA as in previous research (e.g., Gino et al., 2009).”
• The Conjoint Influence of Top and Middle Management Characteristics on Management Innovation (2018, background): “As subordinates may have lower cognitive barriers to accepting cues from similar others (Gino et al., 2009), MM may be more likely to view behaviors relating to supporting MI as part of their expected duties.”