Academic dishonesty in higher education—a nationwide study in Taiwan

By C. Lin, L. Wen. 2007

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/554ec1b28823c21a6f9d5bdc637843c9c094da7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Guangwei Hu
2. Jun Lei

In Safety Research

1. Guangwei Hu
2. Jun Lei
3. Chiao Ling Huang
4. An-Sing Chen
5. Shu Ching Yang
6. Bojana Petrić
7. D. Pecorari

In Social Psychology

1. Chiao Ling Huang
2. An-Sing Chen
3. Shu Ching Yang
4. Guangwei Hu
5. Jun Lei

Citations in the corpus

• An Investigation of College Students’ Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty, Reasons for Dishonesty, Achievement Goals, and Willingness to Report Dishonest Behavior (2013, background): “Lin and Wen (2007) conducted a large-scale survey of 2,068 Taiwanese college students to investigate the prevalence of four types of AD: cheating on exams, cheating on homework, plagiarism, and tampering with files.”
• Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism (2015, background): “This pattern of relationships was consistent with previous studies on attitudes toward academic dishonesty (e.g., Lin & Wen, 2007; McCabe & Trevino, 1995; Newstead et al., 1996; Whitley et al., 1999) which also noted greater attitudinal difference in female-dominated soft disciplines than in…”