Looking into the Future: A Match between Self-View and Temporal Distance

By Guergana Spassova, Angela Y. Lee. 2013

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Marketing, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54e7392ba1a7c736433283218142d1437209ef2e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Richard E. Petty
2. P. Briñol
3. J. Teeny
4. Joseph J. Siev
5. Joan Meyers-Levy
6. B. Loken
7. Zakary L. Tormala
8. Derek D. Rucker

In Marketing

1. P. Briñol
2. Richard E. Petty
3. J. Teeny
4. Joan Meyers-Levy
5. B. Loken
6. Zakary L. Tormala

In Social Psychology

1. Richard E. Petty
2. P. Briñol
3. J. Teeny
4. Joseph J. Siev
5. Joan Meyers-Levy
6. B. Loken
7. Zakary L. Tormala
8. Derek D. Rucker

Citations in the corpus

• A Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion (2020, background): “…& Gelb, 1996), as well as temporally distant (vs. proximal) benefits for independent (vs. interdependent) selfconstrual (Pounders et al., 2015; Spassova & Lee, 2013) have all been shown to produce enhanced persuasion, because these kinds of messages are more compatible with the person’s…”
• Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead☆ (2015, background): “Supporting the premise that males (females) are likely to engage in more abstract (concrete) thinking, Spassova and Lee (2013) found that people with a salient independent (interdependent) self-view construed actions in a more abstract (concrete) manner.”