Methodological Commentary The Precision of Reliability and Validity Estimates Re-Visited: Distinguishing Between Clinical and Statistical Significance of Sample Size Requirements

By D. Cicchetti. 2001

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5494bebc17dbf5cb07be905c76d8c89e9c1b363a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. Nancy C. Jordan
2. R. Gersten
3. Chaitanya Ramineni
4. Ben Clarke
5. C. Wilkins
6. J. Glutting
7. Rebecca Newman-Gonchar
8. Marc A. Brackett

Citations in the corpus

• Regulating anger and sadness: an exploration of discrete emotions in emotion regulation (2007, background): “These reliabilities are all in the acceptable range (Cicchetti, 2001).”
• Universal Screening in Mathematics for the Primary Grades: Beginnings of a Research Base (2012, background): “00 being “excellent” (Cicchetti, 2001). In contrast, Seethaler and Fuchs (2010) perform a much more sophisti-”
• Validating a Number Sense Screening Tool for Use in Kindergarten and First Grade: Prediction of Mathematics Proficiency in Third Grade (2010, background): “714; Rice & Harris, 2005) and five of six exhibited good levels clinical significance (Cicchetti, 2001).”