Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute?
By Gregory Jackson, A. Apostolakou. 2010
852 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/543e72cf413f9c994f8c3ba9edea48f9427bd329
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Government Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: Support and Institutionalization (2013, neutral): “Reflecting Crouch’s (2005) distinction between two institutional complementarities, CSR is understood to fit in with domestic institutional structures by either ‘substituting’ (Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010; Kinderman, 2012; Matten and Moon, 2008) or ‘mirroring’ (Campbell, 2007; Gjølberg, 2009) exta”
- Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance (2017, methodology): “This last result supports the findings by Jackson and Apostolakou (2010) who show that larger firms achieve higher levels of CSP as they are likely to receive greater scrutiny from the general public and government.”
- Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? (2011, neutral): “…2008), articulate their commitment and attention to community issues (Maignan & Ralston, 2002), and tend to score higher on several dimensions of CSR (Jackson & Apostolakou, 2010).8 Journal of International Business Studies We also control for the characteristics of the local market (i.e., MSA).”
- Seeking Legitimacy Through CSR: Institutional Pressures and Corporate Responses of Multinationals in Sri Lanka (2015, neutral): “…and approaches to legitimacy-seeking in the context of CSR practices of MNE subsidiaries through detailed case studies (Chapple & Moon 2007) differentiating between industrial sectors (Jackson and Apostolakou 2010) and political cultures (Gjolberg 2009) prevalent across different countries.”
- Maximizing Stakeholders’ Interests (2012, background): “However, as recent empirical studies show (Apostolakou & Jackson, 2009) the influence of different corporate governance systems on CSR practices is not clear and may respond to an intent to substitute the institutionalized forms of stakeholder participation.”
- ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries (2019, background): “While most of the prior research has focused mainly on country sustainability characteristics as a driver of ESG performance or disclosure (e.g., Jackson & Apostolakou, 2010; Ioannou & Serafeim, 2012), our study addresses its moderating role in affecting the anticipated benefits of ESG performance…”
- A Cognitive Perspective on the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability (2015, neutral): “When discussing why firms engage in corporate sustainability activities, many authors take organizational or industry level approaches, often drawing on institutional theory (e.g. Campbell, 2006; Doh and Guay, 2006; Husted and Allen, 2006; Yang and Rivers, 2009; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010; Bramme”
- An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications (2012, background): “…were not found to be influential in the form of CSR practiced within MNCs. Coercive isomorphic pressure from society While things such as industry (Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010) or health of the economy (Campbell, 2007) were found to influence business activity on CSR within the literature,…”
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, background): “Turning to the aspect of diversity, quite a number of publications which have applied institutional theory to the study of CSR are interested in understanding cross-national variations of CSR practices (Gjolberg, 2009; Blasco and Zolner, 2010; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010).”