Contextual Inhibitors of Employee Creativity in Organizations
By Jin Nam Choi, Troy A. Anderson, Anick Veillette. 2009
196 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53b7c44bd344eb8cc5c2d755efc28073ded1860e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity (2012, background): “Employees high on creative self-efficacy are less likely to be discouraged by potential problems in the workplace that might impede creativity (Choi et al., 2009).”
- Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams (2012, result): “Previous studies have already recognized and demonstrated the importance of domain-relevant skills on individual creativity (Amabile, 1996; Choi et al., 2009).”
- Getting What's New from Newcomers: Empowering Leadership, Creativity, and Adjustment in the Socialization Context (2013, unknown): “Task performance. Managers also rated newcomers’ task performance using a four-item scale developed by Williams and Anderson (1991). A sample item is “Fulfills the responsibilities specified in job description” (α = .”
- Creative Leadership: A Multi-Context Conceptualization† (2015, background): “On the other hand, Choi et al. (2009) found that leader close monitoring was positively associated with employee creativity and reduced the negative effects of aversive leadership on creativity.”