Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships

By Anne Parmigiani, M. Rivera-Santos. 2011

438 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/539e8f727069fa2aabc237d2690269fbaabc489f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review (2021, neutral): “2015; Parmigiani and Rivera-Santos 2011).”
Outcomes to Partners in Multi-Stakeholder Cross-Sector Partnerships: A Resource-Based View (2019, background): “Briefly, a CSSP is a voluntary collaboration between organizations from more than one sector to address a mutually prioritized social issue (Parmigiani & Rivera-Santos, 2011).”
A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals (2016, background): “…the rationale for forming inter-organisational relationships (Parkhe, 1993b), alliance portfolios, knowledge management and the behavioural aspects and effectiveness of international strategic alliances (ISA) (Combs, et al., 2011; Meier, 2011; Parmigiani & Rivera-Santos, 2011; Wassmer, 2010).”
The Many Futures of Contracts (2014, background): “First, when knowledge that is complex, tacit, or less codified is transferred, parties to the contract are likely to define and enforce stronger mechanisms to safeguard their investments (Parmigiani & Rivera-Santos, 2011).”
System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability (2020, background): “They also highlight the importance of enhancing social sustainability capabilities in terms of skills, practices, and organizational processes in both technical and relational ways [5, 12, 53].”
Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, neutral): “Investigation of this research question via a comparative analysis, such as a meta-analysis of the existing studies (see Parmigiani & Rivera-Santos, 2011 foronesuchattempt),iscomplicatedduetodiffer-ences in APD operationalization, industry coverage and time periods, which may preclude meaningful…”
Alliance management capability and firm performance: : Using resource-based theory to look inside the process black box (2015, background): “Beyond the RBT discussions, in general, this article contributes to literatures on alliance management capability and IO relationships, in particular (e.g., Koza and Lewin, 1998; Parmigiani and Rivera-Santos, 2011).”
The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions (2016, background): “In other words, these firms were engaged in what Parmigiani and Rivera-Santos (2011) call “co-exploration” to develop new knowledge rather than “co-exploitation” of existing knowledge.”
Blockchain Governance—A New Way of Organizing Collaborations? (2020, neutral): “…to differentiate tacit versus explicit knowledge within organizations (e.g., Balconi 2002, Zander and Kogut 1995), and it has more recently been extended to the interorganiza-tional setting to depict the characteristics of trans-actions (e.g., Levi et al. 2003, Parmigiani and Rivera-Santos 2011).”
Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity (2013, background): “…of formats for collaboration that organizations may choose has been proposed by different literatures with selective revealing hitherto missing as an option (for recent reviews, see, e.g., Casciaro & Piskorski, 2005; Hillman et al., 2009; Parmigiani & Rivera-Santos, 2011; Phelps et al., 2012).”