Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures

By S. Paunonen, G. Haddock, Friedrich Forsterling, M. Keinonen. 2003

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53955087bd557e42d6368e3df7c4aa28e5fb1ed0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena (2011, background): “Research shows that the relationships between facets within a domain and nonpolitical outcomes vary (e.g., Ashton et al. 1999, Mershon & Gorsuch 1988, Paunonen et al. 2003).”
Consumer acceptance of internet banking: the influence of internet trust (2008, background): “The lower-level facets might therefore be more closely related to overt and observable behaviours (Paunonen et al. 2003).”
Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Their Roots in Big-Five Personality Fa (2006, background): “Thus, in conclusion, our present results support Paunonen et al. (2003) in their contention that Big- Five facets can be expected to outperform Big-Five factors when predicting various external variables.”
The ‘Short Five’ (S5): Measuring Personality Traits Using Comprehensive Single Items (2012, background): “In the prediction of criterion variables, such facet scores will frequently outperform domain scores (Paunonen, 1998; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001; Paunonen, Rothstein, & Jackson, 1999; Paunonen et al., 2003).”
Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science (2009, background): “For example, the behavioural report used by Paunonen et al. (2003) includes ratings of important attributes such as attractiveness, popularity, honesty and intelligence, and it includes items referring to grade point average and obesity.”
Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. (2011, methodology): “In particular, using a larger number of factors is recommended to reduce error in behaviour prediction and increase accuracy in behaviour explanation (Paunonen & Ashton 2001), particularly in the case of relatively complex behaviours, which can be considered multidimensional and multidetermined (Pau”
Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing (2006, background): “…high-level ‘domains’ are related most closely to underlying biophysiological and genetic structures (Bouchard and Loehlin, 2001; McCrae and Costa, 2003) while the lower-level, narrower and domain-specific ‘facets’ are related more closely to overt, observable behaviors (e.g. Paunonen et al., 2003).”