The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers.
By Wei Chen, Tatiana Nekrasova. 2007
255 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52967102a383155664ff711519f455e263922dd0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- A Phrasal Expressions List (2012, result): “Grammaticality judgments of formulaic items were both faster and more accurate than the judgments of matched non-formulaic control strings (Jiang and Nekrasova 2007).”
- What Do We (Think We) Know About Formulaic Language? An Evaluation of the Current State of Play (2012, background): “Reaction time tasks (e.g., Conklin & Schmitt, 2008; Jiang & Nekrasova, 2007; Libben & Titone, 2008), self-paced reading (e.g., Tremblay, Derwing, Libben, & Westbury, 2011), and controlled recall (Tremblay & Baayen, 2010) are now often combined with physical measures such as eye gaze (e.g., Millar,…”
- Teaching Formulaic Sequences: The Same as or Different From Teaching Single Words? (2012, background): “…are processed faster and more accurately than creatively generated language, for example, when embedded in reading texts or when part of grammaticality judgments (Conklin & Schmitt, 2008; Gibbs, Bogadanovich, Sykes, & Barr, 1997; Jiang & Nekrasova, 2007; Underwood, Schmitt, & Galpin, 2004).”
- Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing (2010, unknown): “Their findings provide " prevailing evidence in support of the holistic nature of formula representation and processing in second language speakers " (Jiang & Nekrasova, 2007, p. 433).”