Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education
By Y. Hill, L. Lomas, J. Macgregor. 2003
533 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51b1e84718063675d5a44bda3dfcca791cf07bdb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- M. Balakrishnan
- L. Petruzzellis
- Thorsten Gruber
- R. Voss
- Salvatore Romanazzi
- Tamer H. Elsharnouby
- Ana Margarida Brochado
- Montserrat Díaz-Méndez
Citations in the corpus
- Value co-creation and university teaching quality Consequences for the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) (2012, methodology): “This approach is mainly based on students‟ satisfaction as a lecturers‟ performance indicator (Hill et al., 2003; Marzo-Navarro, et al. 2005; Sakthivel and Raju, 2006).”
- Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: using a new measurement tool (2010, background): “Hill et al. (2003) for example found that the quality of the lecturer belongs to the most important factors in the provision of high quality education.”
- Student co-creation behavior in higher education: the role of satisfaction with the university experience (2015, background): “Others consider faculty–student interaction quality as a primary construct when studying perceptions of HE service quality (Hill et al., 2003; Oldfield & Baron, 2000).”
- Assessing student satisfaction in transnational higher education (2013, background): “These factors are not different to those cited in previous studies on student satisfaction in other countries (e.g. Hill et al., 2003; García-Aracil, 2009; Miliszewska and Sztendur, 2010).”
- Educational value: how students choose university: Evidence from an Italian university (2010, background): “As for most universities the core service delivery method is still the lecture, the quality of the lectures is still very important (Hill et al., 2003; Banwet and Datta, 2003).”
- Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university (2006, result): “This is supported by the research of Hill et al. (2003)”
- The desired teaching qualities of lecturers in higher education: a means end analysis (2006, background): “Likewise, Hill et al. (2003) found that the quality of the lecturer belongs to the most important factors in the provision of high quality education.”
- The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education (2015, unknown): “Hill, Lomas, and MacGregor (2003) found that student satisfaction was influenced by the quality of lecturers and classroom delivery; the quality of feedback given to students in lessons and on assignments; and the interpersonal relationships between students and lecturers.”
- Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education (2009, background): “Datta, 2003, Hill et al ., 2003 and Douglas et al. , 2006) who stated that the most important”
- TQM implementation and students' satisfaction of academic performance (2005, background): “This leads to a number of research questions: how do students in ISO as well as non-ISO engineering institutions perceive the quality of education offered to them? Is there any difference in the levels of quality of education offered between these institutions? Is such a difference significant? From”