Why Do Men and Women Challenge Gender Discrimination in the Workplace? The Role of Group Status and In‐group Identification in Predicting Pathways to Collective Action

By A. Iyer, Michelle K. Ryan. 2009

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51282b321da39fa32eab3ffafed1cfcd776a8f71

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? (2011, background): “…the possibility that advantaged group members may engage in collective action, as long as these individuals perceive themselves to be a representative of a particular group, and perceive collective action as aimed at improving that group’s conditions (Iyer & Ryan, 2009; Van Zomeren & Iyer, 2009).”
“We for She”: Mobilising men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality (2018, methodology): “In contrast, men are more likely to see inequality as illegitimate and more willing to act, the less they identify with their gender (Iyer & Ryan, 2009; see also Becker & Barreto, 2014, for related findings regarding confronting sexism), suggesting that the context of gender equality evokes…”
Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans (2018, background): “…understanding the factors that motivate members of the advantaged group to engage in collective action on behalf of the disadvantaged group (e.g., Iyer & Ryan, 2009; Leach, Iyer, & Pedersen, 2006; Reicher, Cassidy, Wolpert, Hopkins, & Levine, 2006; Thomas, McGarty, & Mavor, 2009; van Zomeren,…”
Introduction to the Social and Psychological Dynamics of Collective Action (2009, background): “For example, van Stekelenburg et al. (2009) and Iyer and Ryan (2009) demonstrate that emotional responses to inequality and injustice predict individuals’ willingness or intentions to take collective action.”
Seeing the Unseen (2011, unknown): “Further, sympathetic responses to descriptions of gender discrimination are associated with intending to engage in collective action to address gender inequality, and women are more likely to report such emotions (Iyer & Ryan, 2009).”
A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers (2015, background): “…of advantaged groups on behalf of a disadvantaged group (e.g., among Whites who are active in anti-racism movements or among men who take action for feminist causes; see Iyer & Ryan, 2009; Saab, Tausch, Spears, & Cheung, 2015; Subašić et al., 2008; van Zomeren, Postmes, Spears, & Bettache, 2011).”