Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming

By Karen L. Dugosh, Paul B. Paulus. 2005

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5058237c682b20528b67ae99d4a6c65c547652bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Social influence, creativity and innovation (2008, background): “When these are shared in the group, ideas can lead to additional ideas by stimulating associations related to the shared ideas (Dugosh & Paulus, 2005 ).”
Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study (2010, background): “And (4) in the cognitive stimulation condition (AUstim), we sought to stimulate creative idea generation by means of the exposure to external (or other people's) ideas, which is known as effective principle in group-based brainstorming techniques (Dugosh and Paulus, 2005).”
Effects of Training on Idea Generation in Groups (2008, background): “This increased attention will also enhance the impact of the diverse perspectives being shared in a group (Dugosh & Paulus, 2005).”
Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process (2011, background): “However, Dugosh and Paulus (2005) found that exposure to common ideas hadmore impact on stimulating additional unique ideas in typical brainstorming paradigm.”
Different Strokes for Different Teams: The Contingent Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on the Creativity of Informationally Homogeneous and Diverse Teams (2017, background): “When team members hold mostly shared information and views, these contributions are more likely to trigger teammates’ insights than in teams lacking shared knowledge (Dugosh & Paulus, 2005; cf. Harvey, 2013).”
Building creative thinking in the classroom: From research to practice (2013, background): “Each alternative (or idea) can fuel additional answers, as in Guideline 2 and consistent with the idea that individuals generate more ideas when presented with more ideas (e.g., Dugosh & Paulus, 2005).”
Beyond Individual Creativity (2012, result): “In line with previous research (e.g., Dugosh & Paulus, 2005; Paulus & Yang, 2000), duplicate ideas were removed in order to provide a clean estimate of the number of unique ideas produced by the team during the dyadic task.”
Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges (2016, background): “Dugosh and Paulus (2005) also found that when compared to novel examples, common examples tend to cause more fixation.”
The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining Fixation and Stimulation Effects. (2014, neutral): “In one experiment, Dugosh and Paulus [10] reported that participants generated more unique solutions when a list of eight ideas was given prior to the brainstorming session.”
Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community (2013, background): “Prior research shows that sharing diverse ideas can stimulate other ideas or categories of ideas when individuals are motivated to directly attend to the stimulus ideas (Dugosh et al. 2000, Dugosh and Paulus 2005, Rietzschel et al. 2007, Kohn et al. 2011).”