Do We Really Need a Reason to Indulge?
By Norbert Schwarz. 2009
101 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4efb18b64165e7ec6d403144f4780411122c2d9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- J. Alba
- Elanor F. Williams
- A. Kronrod
- Norbert Schwarz
- Luc Wathieu
- A. Grinstein
- Martin Weber
- Markus Glaser
In General Decision Sciences
- J. Alba
- Elanor F. Williams
- A. Kronrod
- A. Grinstein
- Luc Wathieu
- Norbert Schwarz
- Adam J. Berinsky
- Jonathan Evans
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Alba
- Elanor F. Williams
- A. Kronrod
- A. Grinstein
- Luc Wathieu
- Norbert Schwarz
- D. Oyserman
- Bertram Gawronski
Citations in the corpus
- Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption (2013, methodology): “…of food to influence judgments of tastiness (Raghunathan et al., 2006), and incorrectly predict enjoyment of an indulgence based on whether its consumption can be justified (Xu & Schwarz, 2009). objectives, as well as the accuracy of those expectations, is vital to improving consumers' lives.”
- Enjoy! Hedonic Consumption and Compliance with Assertive Messages (2012, background): “Participants also answered three guilt-related items (“feel guilty/it would be a mistake/will regret”), adapted from Xu and Schwartz (2009).”
- Why researchers should think "real-time": A cognitive rationale. (2012, background): “Extending this accessibility model of emotion report, Schwarz, Kahneman and Xu (2009; Xu & Schwarz, 2009) noted that the same semantic knowledge serves as a basis for predicting future feelings, for which episodic information is not available to begin with.”