Introduction to the special issue: Current research in Cattell–Horn–Carroll–based assessment

By J. Newton, K. McGrew. 2010

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e7f47aad4c29a0484ba6ecff8e0b502945bec1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. T. Keith
2. Matthew R. Reynolds
3. K. McGrew
4. Barbara J. Wendling
5. Y. Kim
6. Christiany Suwartono
7. Paul J Silvia
8. Roger E. Beaty

In Education

1. Barbara J. Wendling
2. K. McGrew
3. T. Keith
4. Y. Kim
5. Nicole J. Conrad

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Matthew R. Reynolds
2. K. McGrew
3. T. Keith
4. Barbara J. Wendling
5. Christiany Suwartono
6. Paul J Silvia
7. Roger E. Beaty
8. Kristóf Kovács

Citations in the corpus

• Cattell-Horn-Carroll Abilities and Cognitive Tests: What We've Learned from 20 Years of Research. (2010, background): “Carroll suggested that Piagetian Reasoning is a narrow ability subsumed by Gf (Carroll, 1993; Newton & McGrew, 2010), so it seems reasonable that such differences could be due to changes in the structure of intelligence as children develop.”
• Cattell–Horn–Carroll cognitive‐achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research (2010, background): “As summarized by Newton and McGrew (2010), the Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) taxonomy of cognitive abilities is the consensus framework from which cognitive abilities are now most often Correspondence to: Kevin S. McGrew, 1313 Pondview Lane E., St. Joseph, MN 56374.”