Innovation and firm performance
By Ron G. M. Kemp, M. Folkeringa, Jeroen de Jong, Emiel F. M. Wubben. 2003
272 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ddb86201d287a460469bfbc6e240972c1bd2a2d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Nina Rosenbusch
- J. Brinckmann
- Andreas Bausch
- Antonia Madrid‐Guijarro
- Domingo García‐Pérez‐de‐Lema
- A. Kleinknecht
- Cees van Beers
- Howard E. Van Auken
Citations in the corpus
- Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): The Engine of Economic Growth through Investments and Innovation (2020, background): “The two conditions are essentially related as follows: the human resources training limits the usage of new technologies in the field for active companies and even for their management [91].”
- Outsourcing and Firm-level Performance (2002, background): “Another strand of literature emphasizes the role of intangible assets, e.g. human capital or technological knowledge, for firms 4 (Kleinknecht and Mohnen, 2002; Webster, 1999).”
- The Impact of Innovation on the Performance of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: Evidence from Malaysia (2013, background): “country), innovation can be done only when resources (especially capital) are sufficient for doing R&D (Kemp et al., 2003).”
- Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review (2003, result): “4 For similar results see several chapters in Kleinknecht (1996) and Kleinknecht and Mohnen (2002).”
- Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs (2011, background): “Sample sizes range from 40 (Wang and Bee Lian, 2004) to 2999 (Kemp et al., 2003).”