Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework
By M. Phipps, Lucie K. Ozanne, M. Luchs, Saroja Subrahmanyan, Sommer Kapitan, J. Catlin, Roland Gau, R. Naylor, R. L. Rose, Bonnie Simpson and 1 more. 2013
426 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dd26a09867b1f26f281742d95d5724eccfd8686
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Marketing
- Maria Ek Styvén
- Marcello M. Mariani
- Andrzej Szymkowiak
- Diego Costa Pinto
- Elżbieta Żelichowska
- S. Curtis
- Abdullah Al Mamun
- Natalia Raszka
In Strategy and Management
- Diego Costa Pinto
- S. Curtis
- Frederico Cruz-Jesus
- Abdullah Al Mamun
- Marcello M. Mariani
- Antti Ukkonen
- Maria Ek Styvén
- Mimmi Sjöklint
Citations in the corpus
- The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption (2016, positive): “although consumers may be ideologically and ethically minded, their aspirations may not translate into sustainable behavior (e.g., Bray et al., 2011; Phipps et al., 2013; Vermeir & Verbeke, 2006).”
- “Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes? (2015, background): “Further, they present very promising opportunities for future research on sustainable consumption which is needed given the inherent complexity and conflicting emotions experienced within this unique context (Phipps et al. 2013).”
- Inside the sustainable consumption theoretical toolbox: Critical concepts for sustainability, consumption, and marketing (2017, background): “Moreover, consumption realities suggest that market forces do play a role in influencing consumers' consumption choices (Phipps et al., 2013) that violate the general assumption that governs mindful consumption (i.”
- Circular economy engagement: Altruism, status, and cultural orientation as drivers for sustainable consumption (2021, background): “not only important but necessary (Phipps et al., 2013), and changing individual behavior is central to achieving a sustainable future (McKenzie-Mohr, 2000).”
- Towards Building Sustainable Consumption: A Study of Second-Hand Buying Intentions (2020, background): “There are three core dimensions of sustainability: environmental, social, and economic [31].”
- Understanding the intention to buy secondhand clothing on sharing economy platforms: The influence of sustainability, distance from the consumption system, and economic motivations (2020, positive): “…psychology (Dahlstrand & Biel, 1997; Stern, Kalof, Dietz, & Guagnano, 1995), consumer behavior (Gullstrand Edbring et al., 2016; Luchs et al., 2011; Phipps et al., 2013; Stanley, Lasonde, & Weiss, 1996; Tanner & Wölfing Kast, 2003), as well as in the area of collaborative consumption (Hamari et…”
- Environmental Knowledge, Awareness, and Business School Students’ Intentions to Purchase Green Vehicles in Emerging Countries (2018, background): “Future research could also consider the tenets of theories other than TPB, such as Reciprocal deterministic theory (RDT) and/or developmental theory model (DTM), to better understand sustainable consumer behaviors [77,78].”
- Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability (2019, background): “The practice of sharing promises many societal benefits: to provide an opportunity to save and/or make money [34,35]; to change consumer behaviour [12,36]; to reduce resource use and usher in more sustainable consumption [13,37]; to facilitate sustainable economic growth [38]; and to enhance social ”