The effects of mentoring on academic careers over time: Testing performance and political perspectives

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Informal Mentoring at Work: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2016, unknown): “The size of one’s advice network is positively related to career success (Van Emmerik 2004), the number of developers and the amount of support are positively related to work satisfaction (Higgins 2000), and the number of developmental relationships predicts rank achieved among American academics (K”
Types of Workplace Social Support in the Prediction of Job Satisfaction (2007, background): “Career Mentoring was related to higher levels of job satisfaction; recent research on mentoring indicates that it is associated with higher levels of career success (Kirchmeyer, 2005).”
Mapping a Mentoring Roadmap and Developing a Supportive Network for Strategic Career Advancement (2017, background): “…of a mentor in getting to know the personal strengths and weaknesses of an individual—“learning” the person (Montgomery, 2015a)—allows the mentor to address an individual’s unique needs in the mentoring relationship (Baker & Griffin, 2010; Kirchmeyer, 2005; Montgomery et al., 2014; Ramirez, 2012).”
A Review of Developmental Networks (2012, background): “A person’s number of developers is positively related to job, work, and career satisfaction (Higgins, 2000; Higgins & Thomas, 2001; van Emmerik, 2004), job performance (Kirchmeyer, 2005; Peluchette & Jeanquart, 2000), retention (Higgins & Thomas, 2001), rank (Kirchmeyer, 2005), and promotions (Higgi”