The role of social capital and gender in linking financial suppliers and entrepreneurial firms: A framework for future research

By C. Brush, Nancy M. Carter, P. Greene, M. Hart, E. Gatewood. 2002

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cef02ad630bd989b1c44862845f64e75052a311

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Jeffrey E. Sohl
2. John R. Becker-Blease
3. Dilani Jayawarna
4. Oswald Jones
5. C. Brush
6. P. Greene
7. Massimo G. Colombo
8. Colin Mason

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. C. Brush
2. Jeffrey E. Sohl
3. John R. Becker-Blease
4. Colin Mason
5. M. Roomi
6. Dilani Jayawarna
7. P. Greene
8. Oswald Jones

Citations in the corpus

• Diana: a symbol of women entrepreneurs’ hunt for knowledge, money, and the rewards of entrepreneurship (2009, background): “We then designed a number of research projects concerning women business owners who had an interest in expanding their firms and sought financing to fuel that growth ( Brush et al. 2002, 2006c; Carter et al. 2003a, b).”
• GENDER, MARRIAGE, AND ASSET ACCUMULATION IN THE UNITED STATES (2005, unknown): “( 2002 ) suggests that, in the US, a relative lack of social networks impedes women's access to the venture capital industry, causing women who own businesses to be left out of this particular avenue of wealth creation.”
• Informal Sources of Venture Finance (2006, background): “Examples of the former include identifying the characteristics of altruistic investors (Sullivan, 1994), women business angels (Brush et al, 2002; Harrison and Mason, 2005) and successful investors.”
• Women Entrepreneurs and Financial Capital (2006, background): “This logic provides two alternative explanations of the findings that women receive a disproportionate low share of capital (Brush et al., 2002; Carter et al., 2003; Greene et al., 2001; Industry Canada, 2005; Verheul & Thurik, 2001).”
• Resourcing new businesses: social networks, bootstrapping and firm performance (2010, background): “Consequently, there is limited research examining the way in which nascent entrepreneurs use their social networks to engage in bootstrapping activities (Brush et al. 2002; Winborg 2009).”
• Entrepreneurial orientation and social capital as small firm strategies: A study of gender differences from a resource-based view (2006, background): “Niehm, 2002, unpublished data; Stone, 1995) and much has been written in the past decade about women and entrepreneurship, (Brush, 1992; Brush et al., 2002; Fischer et al., 1993; Lerner & Almor, 2002).”
• The Effect of Gender Diversity on Angel Group Investment (2011, background): “Finally, Brush et al. (2002), Carter et al. (2003), and Harrison and Mason (2007) suggest that social capital is related to the quality and quantity of deal flow to angels.”
• A comparison of new firm financing by gender: evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data (2009, background): “Alternatively, women may experience subtle forms of discrimination or difficulty in securing access to networks used by providers of external capital (Brush et al. 2002; Marlow and Patton 2005).”
• Exploring the Career/Achievement and Personal Life Orientation Differences between Entrepreneurs and Nonentrepreneurs: The Impact of Sex and Dependents (2006, background): “…JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 6For a perspective on these facets of diversity within women entrepreneurs, see Scherer, Brodzinski, and Wiebe (1990), Alvarez and Meyers (1998), and also Brush et al. (2002). ity of the sample is reflective of highly ranked MBA programs in the 1980s and 1990s.”
• About Gender Differences and the Social Environment in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions (2016, background): “Some of these weaknesses are fewer financial, human, and network resources (Becker-Blease and Sohl 2007; Brush et al. 2002; Carter and Allen 1997; Fabowale, Orser, and Riding 1995; Marlow and Patton 2005; Smith-Hunter 2006), or less management experience (Brush et al.”
• Examining the gender wealth gap (2010, background): “Brush et al. (2002) also find that a relative lack of social networks reduces women’s access to venture capital, thus leaving them out of this particular avenue of wealth creation.”
• Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success (2017, background): “Third, the paper contributes to the literature on serial entrepreneurship by providing additional evidence in a new context beyond VC (Zhang, 2011), business angels (Brush et al., 2002), and debt providers (Uzzi, 1999) that serial entrepreneurs accumulate social capital across projects.”