PISA 2000 technical report

By R. Adams, Margaret Wu. 2002

402 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bc4c0f68759c1010852526eadb045bd9c577f77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

International comparisons of student attainment: some issues arising from the PISA study (2004, background): “The ®rst comprehensive report (OECD, 2001) appeared in 2001 and an extensive (300 page) technical report (Adams & Wu, 2002) provides considerable detail about the procedures used.”
Students emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and ac (2011, methodology): “Scores for individual students were generated using item response theory techniques; the reliability (correlation between independent plau sible value draws, see Adams & Wu, 2002) was r = .77.”
General Pedagogical Knowledge of Future Middle School Teachers: On the Complex Ecology of Teacher Education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan (2011, methodology): “Following the TEDS-M test design for MCK and MPCK (for details, see Tatto et al., 2008), a balanced incomplete block design (Adams & Wu, 2002; von Davier, Carstensen, & von Davier, 2006) with three booklets was used so that each person had to respond to only two thirds of all test items.”
Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School (2004, background): “2 Adams and Wu (2002), OECD (2000, 2001, 2002) and the PISA webpage at www.pisa.oecd.org provide detailed information on the PISA study.”
The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Is It a Myth or Reality? (2014, background): “Factor analyses have shown that the measures have adequate construct validity (Adams & Wu, 2002).”