Technology-Based New Product Development Partnerships

By John E. Ettlie, Paul A. Pavlou. Decision Sciences, 2006

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a49f021db859b5d8c20c22995d6819ee7c038c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance (2007, background): “Evans, Hagiu, and Schmalensee (2006) recognize multisided market interdependencies which likewise require a systems perspective.”
Antecedents and Consequences of Creativity in Product Innovation Teams (2013, background): “High-tech companies were chosen because they exhibit a propensity to engage in intense product innovation activities to enhance creativity, in that the industry is characterized by high uncertainty, rapid changes in industry standards, short technology lifecycles, and faster development cycle times ”
Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights (2013, background): “These digital technologies are fundamentally reshaping traditional business strategy as modular, distributed, crossfunctional, and global business processes that enable work to be carried out across boundaries of time, distance, and function (e.g., Banker et al. 2006; Ettlie and Pavlou 2006; Kohli a”
The "Third Hand": IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities (2010, background): “…which enables NPD work units to share their individual expertise and ideas and collectively work on products in real time by enabling collaboration (Ettlie and Pavlou 2006), becomes more valuable in turbulent environments that require transforming individual ideas to a collective output under time…”
Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities (2011, background): “Extending Ettlie and Pavlou (2006) and Pavlou and El Sawy (2006), the proposed set of dynamic capabilities was captured with a formative model (Figure 3).”
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship (2012, result): “…that the simple positive correlation result linking both DC_quality and routinized_DC’s to firm performance is consistent with most previous empirical work in the DCV (e.g., Adner and Helfat 2003; Ettlie and Pavlou 2006; Lampel and Shamsie 2003; Narasimhan et al. 2006; Wu 2007; Yiu and Lau 2008).”
Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities (2014, background): “…Wang, Klein, & Jian 2007; Zhang, 2007), whereas others consider innovative or technology performance (e.g., Ellonen, Wikström, & Jantunen, 2009; Ettlie & Pavlou, 2006; Wu, 2006), environmental performance (Russo, 2009), or international performance (e.g., Chen & Jaw, 2009; Jantunen et al.,…”
Competence and governance in strategic collaboration: The differential effect of network structure on the creation of core and non-core technology (2012, background): “Moreover, there is a strong appropriability regime in these industries favoring the use of patents as a legal instrument to capture value from technological breakthroughs (Ahuja, 2000; Breschi, Malerba, and Orsenigo, 2000; Ettlie and Pavlou, 2006; Rothaermel and Deeds, 2004).”
The path of innovation: purchasing and supplier involvement into new product development (2015, unknown): “…organizations to hedge its exposure against technological risk by improving the integration capability of new technologies into final products (Ettlie & Pavlou, 2006; Bozdogan et al., 1998), and creating a bookshelf of embryonic technological innovations that may result useful in the future…”
Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity (2009, methodology): “Other researchers demonstrated that accessing technological knowledge held beyond the focal firms’ boundaries improved their innovativeness ( Ettlie and Pavlou 2006, Spencer 2003).”