Competitive Crowding and Risk Taking in a Tournament: Evidence from NASCAR Racing

By Matthew S. Bothner, Jeong‐han Kang, Toby E. Stuart. 2007

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49189ca65eeed8f26bfee433972f1d61274f772f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis (2011, background): “Bothner et al. (2007), Che and Gale (2003), Fullerton and McAfee (1999), Garcia and Tor (2009), Taylor (1995) Generalized free entry in all types of innovation contests is not to be recommended.”
The Psychology of Rivalry: A Relationally Dependent Analysis of Competition (2010, background): “…studies have provided insight on wide range of organizational topics, including equity theory (Harder, 1992), sunk costs (Staw & Hoang, 1995), leadership (Day, Sin, & Chen, 2004; Pfeffer & Davis- Blake, 1986), organizational status (Washington & Zajac, 2005), and risk taking (Bothner et al., 2007).”
Minding the Gap (2016, methodology): “We followed the recommendations of Boyd (1995) for these measures.”
Attention to Attention (2011, unknown): “zations (Bothner et al. 2007), alternative theories or”
Reputation and Status: Expanding the Role of Social Evaluations in Management Research (2016, background): “Podolny 2005: Bothner et al. 2007). Less work, however, links these different levels in the reasoning by linking micro-level mechanisms to macro-level outcomes. Recent work is heading in this direction. For instance, Skvoretz and Fararo (2016) relate how macro-status positions (e.”
Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005–2013 (2015, result): “We align with other studies of this setting by using the final championship classification as a viable measure of performance because winning races represents what all firms declare to be their ultimate goal (Bothner et al., 2007; Castellucci and Ertug, 2010; Jenkins, 2010; Marino et al., 2015).”