Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A Single Case Analysis

By Hansun Zhang Waring. 2009

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/489352505eb6a98235e0fcccaf9178851255178d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Luke Plonsky
2. F. Oswald
3. Ali H. Al-Hoorie
4. T. Cobb
5. Alex Boulton
6. Joseph P. Vitta
7. E. Marsden
8. Dan Brown

Citations in the corpus

• STUDY QUALITY IN SLA (2013, background): “…same study was published elsewhere in the pool of candidate studies, such as in the Best of Language Learning Monograph Series (e.g., Pulido, 2004 ), (c) the study was a literature review or meta-analysis (e.g., Li, 2010 ), or (d) the report presented only qualitative data (e.g., Waring, 2009 ).”
• Classroom Discourse in Foreign Language Classrooms: A Review of the Literature (2012, unknown): “It is important to note here that in the literature on classroom discourse, some researchers have referred to the ubiquitous triadic dialogue sequence/structure as IRE (Lemke, 1990; Mehan, 1979, 1985, 1998), while others referred to it as initiation-response-feedback or IRF (Sinclair & Coulthard, 19”