Effects of multiple solution methods in mathematics learning
By Cornelia S. Grosse, Alexander Renkl. 2006
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47ef410973893046e14dc793910c102f2d4521b9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Tamara van Gog
- Richard E. Mayer
- Fred Paas
- Roxana Moreno
- Alexander Renkl
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Nikol Rummel
- John Sweller
In Education
- Alexander Renkl
- Tamara van Gog
- Richard E. Mayer
- Roxana Moreno
- Fred Paas
- Nikol Rummel
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Kirsten Berthold
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Richard E. Mayer
- Alexander Renkl
- Roxana Moreno
- Tamara van Gog
- Fred Paas
- Patricia A. Alexander
- John Sweller
- Nikol Rummel
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of prompting multiple solutions for modelling problems on students’ performance (2015, background): “However, this path model may be incomplete as other intervening variables such as interest, teachers’ feedback, or the quality of the students’ discussions (Große and Renkl 2006; RittleJohnson and Star 2009) could effect the number of solutions they developed, experience of competence, and their per”
- The array representation and primary children’s understanding and reasoning in multiplication (2009, background): “Gro(3e and Renkl (2006) also showed that written self-explanation prompts can be employed to foster learning.”
- Cognitive load theory: more food for thought (2010, result): “…and GCL is ‘good’, necessary load for schema acquisition), only ex-post facto explanations of the findings can be offered; and (d) the research shows many contradictory results or findings that go against CLT’s predictions (De Croock et al. 1998; Große and Renkl 2006; van Merriënboer et al. 2002).”
- How Effective are Instructional Explanations in Example-Based Learning? A Meta-Analytic Review (2010, result): “Whereas some studies explicitly examined the role of different example formats (e.g., Gerjets et al. 2006; Große and Renkl 2006), other studies did not provide detailed information about this aspect.”
- Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, background): “In a previously described study, Belcher et al. (2003) manipulated the learning environment by providing “gender-appropriate” feedback to reinforce learners’ original “gen-der-appropriate” belief, resulting in a gendered difference in skill performance outcome.”
- Do Multiple Solutions Matter? Prompting Multiple Solutions, Interest, Competence, and Autonomy (2014, background): “Many studies that have investigated the use of multiple solutions have reported positive results with regard to students’ achievement (Große & Renkl, 2006; Rittle-Johnson & Star, 2007, 2009; Rittle-Johnson, Star, & Durkin, 2009; Star & Rittle-Johnson, 2009).”
- Instructional Aids to Support a Conceptual Understanding of Multiple Representations. (2009, background): “This type of relating can be accomplished on a surface level and does not necessarily mean that the learners consider structural aspects (see Seufert & Brünken, 2004).”
- Example-Based Learning: Integrating Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Research Perspectives (2010, methodology): “comparing examples of different (representations of) solution methods (Große and Renkl 2006; Rittle-Johnson et al. 2009), or by using conceptually oriented equations rather than computationally oriented equations (e.”