Now you see it, now you don't: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world

By Gerry T. M. Altmann, Yuki Kamide. 2004

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/477bf5ff903d2203bed464ad5ab25e138f9e91ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness (2007, background): “Given that it takes some time to program and initiate a saccadic eye movement (with estimates varying between 100 ms and 180 ms; see Altmann & Kamide, 2004 , for review), fixation probabilities were also examined 200 ms after the offset of the acoustic target word (cf.”
The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search (2009, background): “For example, what do participants in the visual-world paradigm think they are supposed to do? What else are they supposed to do besides look at the visual array? There are also issues related to the nature of data analysis in the paradigm (see Altmann & Kamide, 2004 , for a good discussion).”
Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension (2008, background): “A consistent finding is that they spontaneously fixate on the object that is named next, as soon as the auditory evidence becomes unambiguous (for a recent review, see Altmann & Kamide, 2004).”
Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing (2009, background): “E urope PM C Funders A uthor M anuscripts E urope PM C Funders A uthor M anuscripts concurrent language (see also Altmann & Kamide, 2004, for related findings).”
Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing* (2013, background): “…based on the visual examination of the fixations over time, taking into consideration the time needed to program and launch a saccade (e.g., Altmann & Kamide, 2004; Fischer, 1992; Hallet, 1978; Matin, Shao & Boff, 1993; Saslow, 1967), and following other visual world studies (e.g., Dahan…”
Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity (2006, methodology): “Word time windows were identified by aligning utterances on a word-by-word and trial-by-trial basis, as recommended by Altmann and Kamide (2004) .”
Looking To Understand: The Coupling Between Speakers' and Listeners' Eye Movements and Its Relationship to Discourse Comprehension (2005, background): “Just as participants in Altmann and Kamide’s (2004) experiments use their knowledge of verbs to make eye movements toward likely agents and patients, it seems plausible that listeners in our study are establishing reference, using various sources of information in the speech stream.”
Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: insight into the semantics-pragmatics interface. (2009, background): “…research on the development of word recognition (Fernald, Pinto, Swingley, Weinberg, & McRoberts, 1998; Swingley & Fernald, 2002; see also Altmann & Kamide, 2004) and allow us to factor out early differences in fixation patterns by specifically comparing trials on which participants were looking…”
Facilitating Understanding of Movements in Dynamic Visualizations: an Embodied Perspective (2011, background): “Participants listening to stories about skyscrapers while looking at a blank screen in front of them, often make eye movements in the direction (upward or downward) of the verbally described motion (Spivey and Geng 2001; also see Altmann and Kamide 2004).”