Looking To Understand: The Coupling Between Speakers' and Listeners' Eye Movements and Its Relationship to Discourse Comprehension

By Daniel C. Richardson, Rick Dale. Cognitive Sciences, 2005

667 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7caf09d84a7428c863df060af9eb737a85f479c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Naturalizing joint action: A process-based approach (2012, background): “…participants are understanding each other or, in other words, the better they succeed in fulfilling the shared goal or intention of communicating with one another (Richardson & Dale, 2005; see also Ireland, Slatcher, Eastwick, Scissors, Finkel, et al., forthcoming; Tanenhaus & Brown-Schmidt, 2008).”
The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. (2013, background): “…Ulzen et al. 2008) or sitting (Schmidt et al. 1990), body posture sway when conversing (Shockley et al. 2003, Varlet et al. 2010), eye movements (Richardson & Dale 2005), clapping (Neda et al. 2000), pendulum swinging (Richardson et al. 2005, Schmidt & O’Brien 1997), rocking chair movement…”
Multimodal Learning Analytics and Education Data Mining: using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks (2016, background): “Richardson and Dale (2005), for instance, found that the degree of gaze recurrence between individual speaker– listener dyads (i.e., the proportion of alignment of their gazes) was correlated with the listeners’ accuracy on comprehension questions. In a remote collaboration, Jermann, Mullins, Nüssli”
The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements (2007, background): “…and scene information in language acquisition (e.g., Harris, Jones, Brookes, & Grant, 1986; Dunham, Dunham, & Curwin, 1993; Snow, 1977, see also Richardson & Dale, 2005 and Richardson, Dale & Kirkham, in press, for related evidence on joint attention in adults), Knoeferle & Crocker outlined…”
Conversation and Coordinative Structures (2009, background): “…that the hypothesized shared representations would serve to facilitate the understanding of the actions of another (e.g., Blakemore & Decety, 2001; Richardson & Dale, 2005), predict the actions of others (e.g., Ramenzoni, Riley, Shockley, & Davis, 2008; Bosbach, Cole, Prinz, & Knoblich, 2005),…”
Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds (2010, background): “Richardson and Dale (2005) asked four speakers to look at an array of pictures of characters from two well-known television shows (Friends and The Simpsons).”
Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data (2011, background): “The study by Richardson and Dale (2005) discussed above provides evidence that emergent coordination between the eye movements of a speaker and a listener can aid understanding.”
Interpersonal Synchrony: A Survey of Evaluation Methods across Disciplines (2012, background): “cross-spectral coherence [80], [107], [77] or power spectrum”
Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning (2010, background): “…of synchronizing the visual attention distribution between two persons have also been obtained in discourse scenarios, where it has been shown that a better comprehension of a dialogue is achieved if a listener attends to the same objects at the same time as a speaker (Richardson & Dale, 2005).”
Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. (2006, background): “Further evidence that sharing representations of objects and events is important for joint action comes from studies involving verbally mediated coordination [ 11 ].”
Unraveling the Dyad: Using Recurrence Analysis to Explore Patterns of Syntactic Coordination Between Children and Caregivers in Conversation (2006, background): “Whether eye movements (Richardson & Dale, 2005), postural adjustments in conversation (Shockley et al., 2003), or syntactic coordination between interlocutors (Branigan et al., 2000), there are many levels at which humans “synchronize” while communicating.”
Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology: theory, modeling, and analysis (2014, neutral): “For instance, a researcher could record which object is being looked at and in what sequence during a joint task (Richardson & Dale, 2005), which words and sequences of words are used by an individual or group of individuals during a conversation (Louwerse, Dale, Bard, & Jeuniaux, 2012), or a…”