Technological exploration through licensing: new insights from the licensee’s point of view

By Keld Laursen, Maria Isabella Leone, Salvatore Torrisi. 2010

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/476a2fbff6bd27253c8cf1951b4769b181406929

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Licensing-in fosters rapid invention! the effect of the grant-back clause and technological unfamiliarity (2012, unknown): “used by Laursen et al. (2010), who studied the”
Process Innovation: Open Innovation and the Moderating Role of the Motivation to Achieve Legitimacy (2018, background): “Working with external parties, such as suppliers, users, competitors, research organizations and universities (Laursen and Salter, 2014), enables an organization to search and subsequently integrate external innovations (Dodgson et al., 2006; Laursen et al., 2010).”
Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation? (2012, methodology): “Similar measures of local versus non-local search are used in other studies (Benner and Tushman, 2002; Laursen et al., 2010; Phelps, 2010).”
Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance (2012, background): “The dynamic capabilities of learning type related to a firm’s absorptive capacity and more specifically its capability to accumulate knowledge (assimilation capacity) and its ability to scan, identify, and evaluate the potential value of external knowledge (monitoring ability) may be important drive”
Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation (2014, unknown): “Perhaps more frequently, scholars have argued that absorptive capacity makes remote collaboration more effective (de Jong and Freel, 2010), and firms with a broader knowledge base are more likely to externally source technologically “distant” technologies (Laursen et al., 2010).”