Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation?

By Keld Laursen. 2012

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2a0846ece15bc2245dcce279da074f8fa017b1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ammon J. Salter
2. Ben R. Martin
3. Alfredo De Massis
4. Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli
5. Federico Frattini
6. Keld Laursen
7. Mike Wright
8. J. Kotlar

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Alfredo De Massis
2. Federico Frattini
3. Ammon J. Salter
4. Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli
5. Ben R. Martin
6. J. Kotlar
7. Keld Laursen
8. Mike Wright

In Strategy and Management

1. Keld Laursen
2. Ammon J. Salter
3. Alfredo De Massis
4. Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli
5. Ben R. Martin
6. Federico Frattini
7. Mike Wright
8. J. Kotlar

Citations in the corpus

• Twenty challenges to innovation studies (2015, background): “48 For reviews of this work, see Raisch and Birkinshaw (2008) and Laursen (2012).”
• Innovation Through Tradition: Lessons From Innovative Family Businesses and Directions for Future Research (2016, background): “First, past knowledge may be recombined with technologies from distant industrial fields (Messeni Petruzzelli & Savino, 2014), hence augmenting the variety and scope of the recombination process (Katila & Ahuja, 2002; Laursen, 2012).”
• The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration (2014, background): “The innovation process nvolves resource intensive search to find commercially exploitable ew combinations of knowledge or technology (Nelson and Winter, 982; Stuart and Podolny, 1996; Hargadon and Sutton, 1997; leming and Sorenson, 2004; Laursen, 2012).”