The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice

By Irene V. Blair. 2002

1,084 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46bfd4d2c9f3030b2352a7efa48abdb4d5ddef55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Consumer Behavior (2006, background): “Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice.”
What moderates implicit—explicit consistency? (2005, background): “The studies reviewed on the implicit assessment process provide clear evidence for the notion that implicitly assessed representations are subject to a variety of situational and extraneous influences (Blair, 2002).”
“Math is Hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes (2006, methodology): “…such as the context-dependent nature of White participants' implicit bias towards Blacks, and has often made use of strong manipulations, including anti-bias interventions or visual imagery (Blair, 2002; Kawakami, Dovidio, Moll, Hermsen, & Russin, 2000; Kawakami, Phills, Steele, & Dovidio, 2005).”
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP ) and the Malleability of Ageist Attitudes (2009, methodology): “However, a recent theme in the literature concerns the malleability of implicit cognitions, which are believed to be less available to introspection and deliberate control (see Bargh, 1999; Blair, 2002).”
The Relationship Between Level of Training, Implicit Bias, and Multicultural Competency Among Counselor Trainees (2008, background): “The lower reliability might be explained by the fact that implicit measurement is influenced by subtle variations in the testing situation and stimuli used (Blair, 2002).”
Societal and Managerial Implications of Implicit Social Cognition: Why Milliseconds Matter (2004, background): “While implicit bias, as measured by the IAT, appears to be an individual difference to some extent, it is also prone to situational influences (Blair, 2002).”
Activating and Suppressing Hostile and Benevolent Racism: Evidence for Comparative Media Stereotyping (2007, positive): “However, even automatically activated prejudicial responses can be suppressed under appropriate situational and motivational circumstances (Blair, 2002; Devine & Monteith, 1999) The current study explores the role of media literacy training and counter-stereotypical media exemplars in decreasing pre”
Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions (2011, neutral): “This is both because the former is a continuous, objective, and quantifiable variable, whereas the latter is categorical (and increasingly subjective), and because implicit attitudes are thought to result from many sources beyond one’s own race, including environmental exposure (25) and personal int”
Goal-Dependent and Goal-Independent Effects of Irrelevant Evaluations (2002, background): “(2001), dissociations of this kind bear on two issues of considerable debate: (a) the extent to which the automatic activation of attitudes is malleable (Blair, 2001) and in particular goal-dependent and (b) whether the processing of evaluative information must be assumed to differ from cognitive pr”
Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength. (2007, background): “The findings (see Blair, 2002 for a detailed review) revealed what has been viewed by some as a surprising sensitivity of implicit measures to immediate contextual factors and, hence, has raised questions about the relative stability versus malleability of automatically activated attitudes.”
Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. (2013, background): “Pre-exposure to information can influence IAT scores (Blair, 2002) and we hypothesize that the increase in implicit racial bias scores found in the study of Groom et al. (2009) was due not to embodiment, but to the pre-exposure of being placed into a situation that is known for race discrimination.”
Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. (2003, methodology): “Although participants attending to race and gender both showed the explicit context-updating effects, the effect was larger for participants attending to race, F(1,34) = 9.”
The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore (2009, neutral): “…factors that make egalitarianism more likely and its opposite, intergroup bias, less likely (e.g., Amodio et al., 2003, 2004, 2006, 2008; Blair, 2002; Dasgupta & Rivera, 2006; Devine et al., 2002; Dunton & Fazio, 1997; Fazio et al., 1995; Glaser & Knowles, 2008; Hofmann, Gschwendner,…”