Goal-Dependent and Goal-Independent Effects of Irrelevant Evaluations

By Karl Christoph Klauerxy, J. Musch. 2002

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e564e97f4bf7d2f7488c9a80547347714f36460

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Galen Bodenhausen
2. Bertram Gawronski
3. Tristan Lavender
4. Bernhard Hommel
5. Florian Arendt
6. J. de Houwer
7. Laura A. Creighton
8. Wilhelm Hofmann

In Social Psychology

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. Galen Bodenhausen
3. Tristan Lavender
4. Bernhard Hommel
5. J. de Houwer
6. Nilanjana Dasgupta
7. Florian Arendt
8. Laura A. Creighton

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. Galen Bodenhausen
3. Tristan Lavender
4. Bernhard Hommel
5. J. de Houwer
6. Nilanjana Dasgupta
7. Florian Arendt
8. D. Barnes-Holmes

Citations in the corpus

• Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model (2007, background): “…measures to assess goal–independent evaluations is controversial (e.g., De Houwer, Hermans, Rothermund & Wentura, 2002; De Houwer & Randell, 2004; Klauer & Musch, 2002), there is evidence from cognitive neuroscience suggesting that affective responses in the amygdala and in the right insula are…”
• Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account (2007, background): “For instance, Klauer and Musch (2002) compared the effects of affective and nonaffective priming under evaluative and nonevaluative task goals.”