Power Distance Belief, Power, and Charitable Giving

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When public recognition for charitable giving backfires: The role of independent self-construal (2018, unknown): “Whether an appeal promotes benefits to others is an interesting avenue to explore, as it is possible that the type of appeal (Han et al. 2017; Park and Lee 2015; Scholsser and Levy 2016; Kulow and Kramer 2016) that is made salient could moderate our results.”
Organizations and Societal Economic Inequality: A Review and Way Forward (2020, background): “The studies we reviewed above show that individuals donate less when they accept inequality, but donate more when they believe that they have the power to change the situation (Han et al., 2017; Winterich & Zhang, 2014).”
Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief (2019, methodology): “That is, low-power individuals are more communal and other-oriented than their high-power counterparts (Han et al. 2017).”