The Decision to Persist with Underperforming Alliances: The Role of Trust and Control

By Holger Patzelt, Dean A. Shepherd. 2008

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45307c2e1148bd936427a46b7986c2d1a19d5b79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Yannick Bammens
2. Veroniek Collewaert
3. Michele J. Gelfand

In Strategy and Management

1. Jacob Guinot
2. Fermín Mallén
3. Yannick Bammens
4. Veroniek Collewaert
5. Michele J. Gelfand
6. Ricardo Chiva
7. Joaquín Alegre

Citations in the corpus

• At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust (2012, background): “Patzelt and Shepherd (2008) found that a combination of high control governed by rules and social reputation and high trust increased the likelihood that managers decided to continue investment in underperforming alliances.”
• Trust Between Entrepreneurs and Angel Investors (2014, background): “…setbacks to external contingencies rather than to the actual functioning of the entrepreneur and his venture, thereby leading to a lowering of their performance aspirations and standards instead of their actual performance assessments (Patzelt & Shepherd, 2008; Sundaramurthy & Lewis, 2003).”
• Organizational trust and performance: Is organizational learning capability a missing link? (2013, background): “Because of this, some authors have suggested the need to introduce certain variables giving us a better understanding of the relationship (Patzelt & Shepherd, 2008; Dyer & Chu, 2011; Gaur et al., 2011).”