Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm
By Jonas Eliasson, Lars-Göran Mattsson. 2006
342 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45112b5f9781b77f0365570a547b50518d7868a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Steffen Kallbekken
- H. Sælen
- Maria Börjesson
- Jonas Eliasson
- David M Levinson
- B. Bureau
- S. Carattini
- A. Baranzini
In Transportation
- Maria Börjesson
- K. Brundell-Freij
- M. Hugosson
- Steffen Kallbekken
- Jonas Eliasson
- B. Bureau
- H. Sælen
- David M Levinson
Citations in the corpus
- Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review (2010, background): “Eliasson and Mattsson (2006) examine the then proposed Stockholm road pricing case for equity consequences.”
- The Stockholm congestion charges – five years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt (2012, background): “A description of the effects can be found in Eliasson et al. (2009). A detailed account of the political process can be found in Gullberg and Isaksson (2009), and experiences from the design and evaluation processes are described in Eliasson (2009a). Isaksson and Richardsson (2009) analyse the strat”
- Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France (2011, background): “5 This assertion does not include the existing literature on congestion charging which obviously consider the distributive impact of congestion reduction (see .g., Bureau and Glachant, 2008, Eliasson and Mattsson, 2006).”
- A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway (2011, background): “Eliasson and Mattsson (2006) study the equity effects of the (then proposed, now implemented) Stockholm congestion charge, and find that the use of the revenues is crucial for the net distributional effects: an effect that is accentuated by “the fact that the total collected charges are more than…”
- Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns (2011, background): “Again the issue of how the revenues are used is central: Eliasson and Mattsson (2006) find that for the equity effects of the Stockholm congestion charge, the two most important factors are the initial travel patterns and how revenues are used.”