The Stockholm congestion charges – five years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Developing the ‘Service’ in Mobility as a Service: Experiences from a Field Trial of an Innovative Travel Brokerage (2016, background): “Examples include (i) economic disincentives for car use, including congestion charges, taxes and parking fees (e.g., Jakobsson et al., 2002; Washbrook et al., 2006; Börjesson et al., 2012), (ii) information campaigns and advertising to increase awareness of the effects of, and alternatives to car us”
Examining drivers of sustainable consumption : the influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden (2017, background): “The sales of ethanol cars were also promoted by a financial incentive (approximately 1000 Euros bonus from 2007 to 2009), exemption from a congestion tax in Stockholm (from 2006 to 2012) and, in some municipalities, free or reduced parking fees (B€orjesson et al., 2012; Mannberg et al., 2014).”
Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP Project. Technical Report. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2013 (2013, background): “A recent study by Börjesson et al. (2012) showed that the air quality improvements have persisted since the scheme was made permanent in 2007.”