Getting What You Need: How Reputation and Status Affect Team Performance, Hiring, and Salaries in the NBA

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Which of These Things Are Not Like the Others? Comparing the Rational, Emotional, and Moral Aspects of Reputation, Status, Celebrity, and Stigma (2019, background): “…a function of the social evaluation being considered, and differences in their social evaluations can affect various organizational outcomes (Dimov & Milanov, 2010; Ertug & Castellucci, 2013;Hubbard et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2011; Pollock et al., 2015; Stern et al., 2014; Washington & Zajac, 2005).”
Examining the “I” in Team: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Influence of Team Narcissism Composition on Team Outcomes in the NBA (2020, background): “The aforementioned advantages likely contribute to why the NBA has beenused by past researchers to test awide variety of organizational hypotheses (e.g., Ertug & Castellucci, 2013; Staw&Hoang, 1995; Swaab, Schaerer, Anicich, Ronay, & Galinsky, 2014).”
Personality Change: Implications for Organizational Behavior (2018, background): “By reputation we refer to how others regard individuals on the basis of their past activities (including performance) at work (Ertug & Castellucci, 2013).”
Exposed: Venture Capital, Competitor Ties, and Entrepreneurial Innovation (2014, background): “In contrast, “reputation” arises directly from examining a firm’s past actions (as distinct from its affiliations) to infer its skills and knowledge (Ertug & Castellucci, 2013).”