Development of a Measure for the Organizational Learning Construct

By Gary F. Templeton, Bruce R. Lewis, Charles A. Snyder. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2002

348 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/445b7a96ea9d6008874c7dd67842d780d5b58b57

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce (2007, background): “Weick and Westley (1996) explain the importance to organisational learning of small rather than big changes or experiments.”
Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences (2006, background): “Organizational emphasis on knowledge management can improve organizational members’ awareness of business initiatives and information technologies, and support the intellectual requirements of IT strategies and projects [96].”
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science (2009, background): “Quantitative measurement instruments are available for measuring an organization's 'learning' capability [55].”
A methodology for construct development in MIS research (2005, methodology): “In MIS studies, dimensions have been derived from sources ranging from researcher interpretations (Lewis et al ., 1995) to multi-dimensional frameworks accepted in the field (Templeton et al ., 2002).”
Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research (2012, background): “Organizational-level studies in which absorptive capacity is not explicitly conceptualized often use absorptive capacity as a background or minor citation (e.g., Swanson and Ramiller 2004; Templeton et al. 2002).”
Measuring the Performance of Information Systems: A Functional Scorecard (2005, background): “…of new items to measure the IS function’s performance in seven new areas: ERP [51], knowledge management [45, 64, 97], electronic business [9, 55], customer relationship management [39], supply chain management [37], electronic commerce [22, 33, 102], and organizational learning [86, 100].”
Towards a learning organization? Employee perceptions (2006, methodology): “While there is a number of audit instruments available in the areas of organizational learning (e..g Garvin, 2000; Templeton et al., 2002), the DLOQ was chosen for the study because it was specifically designed as a “diagnostic tool to measure changes in organizational learning practices and culture”