Schools and Inequality: A Multilevel Analysis of Coleman's Equality of Educational Opportunity Data

By Geoffrey D. Borman, M. Dowling. Teachers College Record, 2010

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background/Context The Equality of Educational Opportunity study is widely recognized as one of the most important studies on schooling ever performed. The findings from the report have shaped the field of education, national education policies, and wider public and scholarly opinion regarding the contributions of schools and schooling to equality and productivity in the United States. Despite past reanalyses of the data and decades of research on the effects of schools as organizations, the report's fundamental finding—that a student's family background is far more important than school social composition and school resources for understanding student outcomes—still retains much of its currency. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study: Using the original Equality of Educational Opportunity data, this study replicated Coleman's statistical models but also applied a two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM) to measure the effects of school-level social composition, resources, teacher characteristics, and peer characteristics on ninth-grade students’ verbal achievement. Research Design HLM allows researchers to disentangle how schools and students’ family backgrounds contribute to learning outcomes. The methodology offers a clearer interpretation of the relative effects of school characteristics, including racial/ethnic composition, and family background, including race/ethnicity and social class, on students’ academic outcomes. Findings/Results Our results suggest that schools do indeed matter, in that when one examines the outcomes across the national sample of schools, fully 40% of the differences in achievement can be found between schools. Even after statistically taking into account students’ family background, a large proportion of the variation among true school means is related to differences explained by school characteristics. Within-school inequalities in the achievement outcomes for African American and White students and students from families of higher and lower social class are explained in part by teachers’ biases favoring middle-class students and by schools’ greater reliance on curriculum differentiation through the use of academic and nonacademic tracking. Conclusions/Recommendations Formal decomposition of the variance attributable to individual background and the social composition of the schools suggests that going to a high-poverty school or a highly segregated African American school has a profound effect on a student's achievement outcomes, above and beyond the effect of individual poverty or minority status. Specifically, both the racial/ethnic and social class composition of a student's school are 1 3/4 times more important than a student's individual race/ethnicity or social class for understanding educational outcomes.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/438ab801cde0c2f85784b4f12eb15b4a93c0468b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Racial-Ethnic Differences at the Intersection of Math Course-taking and Achievement (2010, background): “Borman et al. 2004). For example, Hanushek and Rivkin (2006) find that school segregation has a more detrimental effect on the growth in achievement between third and eighth grade of initially high-scoring African American students than comparable white students.”
Science Achievement Gaps Begin Very Early, Persist, and Are Largely Explained by Modifiable Factors (2016, background): “For example, Borman and Dowling (2010) reported that attending a school with high concentrations of economically disadvantaged or minority children predicted reduced achievement even after accounting for many factors, including prior achievement.”
Inequalities in home learning and schoolsâ€™ provision of distance teaching during school closure of COVID-19 lockdown in the UK (2020, background): “The effects remain significant even after controlling for family background (Borman & Dowling, 2010), suggesting school effects are not simply a result of student selection.”
High School Socioeconomic Segregation and Student Attainment (2013, background): “Two mediating mechanisms were examined, including socioeconomic-based peer influences and school effects.”
Segregating Arizona's English Learners: A Return to the “Mexican Room”? (2012, background): “They have poorer achievement, limiting their lifetime opportunities (Borman & Dowling, 2010; Crosnoe, 2006).”