Variability and Prediction of Measurement Error in Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory Scores a Reliability Generalization Study

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reliability Generalization: Moving toward Improved Understanding and Use of Score Reliability (2002, background): “Working AllianceInventory — 38.0 — — Henson and Hwang (2002) : Learning”
Assessing the Reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores (2005, methodology): “Because the sources of errors using coefficient alpha are not necessarily the same as those for a test-retest reliability estimate (Henson, 2001; Henson & Hwang, 2002), the analyses were carried out separately on coefficient alpha and test-retest coefficients.”
Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait–Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models (2010, background): “Kolb’s (1976) Experiential Learning Model conceptualizes learning styles as individual preferences with respect to four modes: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation (Henson & Hwang, 2002).”
Learning Styles (2008, unknown): “…questionnaires focusing on preferences have at least some psychometric reliability (i.e., a person’s score on one day predicts their score on another day; e.g., Henson & Hwang, 2002; Veres, Sims, & Shake, 1987), the existence of preferences with some coherence and stability is not in dispute.”