Reliability Generalization: Moving toward Improved Understanding and Use of Score Reliability

By T. Vacha-haase, R. Henson, John C. Caruso. 2002

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b320f69c23d66bf0a4efee81bce88fff0f32eae3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Meta-analysis of Cohen’s kappa (2011, background): “…the generalizability of score reliability has very important implications for psychometricians, statisticians and applied researchers who wish to better understand score reliability and its influences on the appropriateness of test use, effect size and statistical power (Vacha-Hasse et al. 2002).”
Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from Correlational Research for Evidence-Based Practice (2005, background): “A problematic practice is to “induct” the reliability coefficient from a prior study or a test manual ( Vacha-Haase et al., 2002 ).”
Two Approaches for Correcting Correlation Attenuation Caused by Measurement Error: Implications for Research Practice (2003, background): “Two decades ago, in a review of the articles in the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ), Willson (1980) reported that less than 50% of the published studies did not report measurement reliability and that only about 37% of the studies reported score reliability coefficients of their own dat”
Assessing the Reliability of the Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores (2005, background): “This figure is consistent with that reported by Willson (1980) and others (e.g., Vacha-Haase et al., 2002).”
Reliability of Bidimensional Acculturation Scores (2009, background): “For example, although it has been suggested that researchers report reliability estimates for each unique measurement (Wilkinson & the APA Task Force on Statistical Inference, 1999), reviews of reporting practices have shown that reliability reporting varies across entire journal volumes (Kieffer, R”
The Reliability and Validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory Scores in Academically Talented Adolescents (2007, background): “Low reliability estimates of scores affect the validity of the constructs being examined and the effect sizes that the scores yield (Thompson, 2003; Vacha-Haase et al., 2002).”